Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eric Wheeler's avatar

Same old, same old. Why would anyone believe your worn out platitudes?!

Expand full comment
Ollie Parks's avatar

I have to hand it to Commissioner Rubio. Everyone involved in these housing projects has done a good job of downplaying the Afrocentric bias that was so obvious in earlier iterations. There is no longer any suggestion that the new housing is a form a reparations for blacks who were allegedly harmed by the allegedly racist urban renewal and freeway building of the 50s, 60s and 70s. You'll search without success for any mention of culturally appropriate on-site wraparound services for blacks as was the case in the past. At one time, to the best of my recollection, they flouted the Fair Housing Act by declaring that a government-involved housing project would accommodate blacks who were exiting homelessness. How did that ever fly?

Still, old habits are hard to break. Of course the Urban League of Portland gets to dip its beak in the trough. Isn't one of the justifications for Portland's new city government that minorities will be able to elect representatives who look like them? That's racist only if you're white, I guess. In any case, I wonder how inclusive the Urban League of Portand's facility will be to residents who are not BIPOC.

I know it's a very silly question, but what is the cost per square foot or cost per unit of this building compared with one that was developed entirely by the private sector? Say - why not just retain a private developer, give them the specificatons and let them have it? At least the structure would not come in at a grossly inflated price that only a progressive housing bureaucrat or pandering politician could love. There would be plenty of time later on for the government agencies who will operate it to run it into the ground.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts